My productiveness dropped off for numerous causes in 2021, however listed here are my 5 greatest weblog posts from a smaller than traditional whole total.
“It’s the framing and the emphasis of the journalism by a number one science journalist at a number one newspaper that calls for scrutiny. It has an affect on readers and on sick individuals that will trigger hurt by selling false hope about extraordinarily preliminary analysis.”
An in depth cousin for #2
“Shoddy, incomplete, fawning information protection of screening checks is likely one of the most clearly established issues in well being information protection – one thing HealthNewsReview.org has revealed numerous instances over the previous 15 years. …. This week, The Guardian drew the ire of many observers on social media and on e mail listservs that I comply with.”
#3 – A 3-fer criticizing the Star Tribune (MN), the Washington Publish, and far Alzheimer’s aducanumab information protection
The headline derived from the primary of three matters I wrote about that day – a Star Tribune story about “survival elevated in mice with COVID-like diseases after they acquired medication that eliminated senescent cells – generally known as ‘retirement’ or ‘zombie’ cells.” I wrote:
“Mythology depicts a zombie as one thing you assume is useless but it surely’s not. Zombie well being care information will not be useless. This story is predicated on fascinating mouse analysis, but it surely’s nonetheless mouse analysis – not entrance web page information for my part, until you’ve got an enormous circulation within the rodent inhabitants.”
Different matters in that day’s horrible triad: Fawning protection of FDA approval of an Alzheimer’s drug, and the Washington Publish continues its troubling sequence of pharma-funded “Chasing Most cancers” occasions.
#4 – A name for extra disclosure about well being care op-ed authors
“Ought to publications that submit op-ed items inform us extra about who wrote the op-ed and what their potential biases and conflicts of curiosity is likely to be? I’m within the camp that solutions a convincing YES.”
This was not our first criticism of STAT’s op-ed publishing practices, as you study for those who learn the weblog submit.
#5 – What Mainstream Media Received Incorrect Concerning the Pandemic and ‘Dreck’ to Drama: How the Media Dealt with and Received Dealt with by COVID
In June, two new journalistic analyses of 2020-21 pandemic information protection – with the 2 titles above – had been launched. I used to be interviewed in each. It was refreshing to see journalists step again and replicate on protection of “the largest story on the earth.”
Abstract: The themes mirrored in these critiques aren’t new.
- selling false hope about extraordinarily preliminary analysis
- shoddy, incomplete, fawning information protection of screening checks
- front-page consideration drawn to mouse analysis
- conflicts of curiosity in information organizations partnering with drug corporations
- failure to reveal conflicts of curiosity in well being care op-ed authors
Within the first two years of COVID-19 pandemic information protection the strain on journalists to satisfy their tasks was larger. With extra newsroom cutbacks, buckle up for extra of the identical in 2022 until information administration faces these issues head on in methods they haven’t earlier than.
A reader posted on Twitter a hyperlink to his personal “favourite of this 12 months’s unhealthy tales” – Aducanumab gives Alzheimer’s sufferers a brand new lease on life