‘The Lacking Cryptoqueen’ Particulars Rise and Fall of Ruja Ignatova


The Lacking Cryptoqueen: The Billion Greenback Cryptocurrency Con and the Lady Who Bought Away with It, by Jamie Bartlett, Hachette Books, 320 pages, $29

Newcomers to bitcoin typically dismiss the cryptocurrency as a pyramid or Ponzi scheme. The OneCoin rip-off reveals what it actually appears like when a pretend blockchain serves as cowl for a multilevel advertising fraud that pays early buyers with funds from new marks.

Right here we see the near-messianic pageantry widespread to overhyped tasks. We see Matryoshka armies of worldwide holding corporations and frontmen. We see starry-eyed everymen scrambling to speculate each final household greenback in “instructional supplies” that include “free” cash (to keep away from triggering rules). We see Curaçaoan banking consortia, Maltese playing issues, and a mysterious maven manipulating all the pieces behind the scenes earlier than absconding all of the sudden into the evening.

Jamie Bartlett’s The Lacking Cryptoqueen particulars the sleazy rise and unsatisfying fall of the OneCoin con whereas investigating the potential whereabouts of the swindler behind all of it: a runaway wannabe-fashionista from Bulgaria named Ruja Ignatova.

In an business rife with swindles, OneCoin is in a league of its personal.

It is not uncommon for cryptocurrency tasks to overpromise on expertise or skimp on safety, resulting in giant losses available on the market or in consumer wallets. It’s not regular for a cryptocurrency to be structured like a multilevel advertising scheme, paying “buyers” extra on an outlined schedule once they recruit others. Neither is it regular for the coin to be fully managed by a for-profit firm with none precise blockchain in any respect, unbeknownst to the various keen “bundle holders.” Consequently, no different alleged cryptocurrency has managed to concoct a mammoth Ponzi scheme leading to $4 billion to $15 billion in losses. Solely Bernie Madoff can examine.

Ignatova had no experience in laptop science or expertise. Her important promoting factors have been that she was once a guide at McKinsey—so spectacular—and appreciated to put on lengthy robes and crimson lipstick. This, mixed along with her unique Germano-Bulgarian accent and hyperlinks with varied Sofia elites, proved sufficient to dazzle gullible targets into placing far an excessive amount of cash into her blockamamie scheme.

Bartlett, who chronicled the early bitcoin and modern cypherpunk communities in his 2014 work The Darkish Internet, teases out what few threads we’ve on the furtive Ignatova to weave a portrait of an bold and shameless con girl who stopped at little or no to undertaking the picture of herself that she wished onto the world. She wished to be wealthy, she wished to be glamorous, and he or she wished to be well-known. Precisely how she acquired there was not her concern.

In 2013, Ignatova teamed up with Sebastian Greenwood, a key grifter on this story, who was at that time hawking a “new Fb” multilevel advertising scheme referred to as SiteTalk. He was impressed by Ignatova’s “bitcoin, however for pensions” convention concoction and noticed a chance to mix the hype-driven worlds of cryptocurrency and multilevel advertising to extract most earnings. They shamelessly ripped off an present hybrid referred to as BigCoin and slapped a brand new identify on it: OneCoin.

The masterminds behind OneCoin clearly thought little about such trifling particulars as launching a blockchain or coin economics. Moderately, they centered their energies on recruiting prime multilevel advertising expertise: They poached prime sellers from present pyramids and tried to promote them on the OneCoin concept. The pitch was principally that this ball-gowned Bulgarian would kill bitcoin and “make you wealthy.” For no matter cause, this was sufficient to present OneCoin momentum, and the rip-off began promoting itself.

One power of The Lacking Cryptoqueen is Bartlett’s capacity to mix gripping storytelling with the reasonably dry regulatory context and legalese essential to know how Ignatova pulled this off and simply how brazen the endeavor was. For instance, the OneCoin crew knew that if their pyramid offered cash straight, they might simply run afoul of securities rules, as they might primarily be paying commissions on inventory buying and selling. As an alternative, the crew offered “instructional supplies” about OneCoin that have been tied to “free cash.” A “starter pack” price €100, or $138 USD, for a PDF and round 200 cash; a “Tycoon Dealer” bundle would run you $6,900 for 5 PDFs and 28,000 cash.

For those who offered Tycoon Dealer packages to different marks, you’ll get a minimize of any gross sales they made after that; that is your “downline,” and it is the place the actual cash is made in multilevel advertising schemes. The concept is to broaden your downline as a lot as potential. In observe, this implies cajoling family and friends members into the pyramid. The highest tiny p.c, referred to as the “Crown Diamonds,” made off with thousands and thousands in downline commissions. The overwhelming majority made hen feed, however there was at all times the promise that OneCoin would “go public”—be traded on a significant alternate like Binance—and get a ticket “to the moon.”

The forex itself was a giant pretend. Purchasers would see cash of their pockets after buying an academic bundle. However there was no blockchain there in any respect, only a database that may credit score and debit as requested—at the least normally. The one alternate on which OneCoin could possibly be traded, xcoinx, was secretly owned by OneCoin, which manipulated the worth. One other stress valve was Dealshaker, supposedly an Amazon killer, the place OneCoin promoters might promote tchotchkes for his or her pretend cash. The web sites have been amateurish and hardly practical, with misspelled FAQ pages.

On paper, individuals have been millionaires. Xcoinx would restrict gross sales, set the worth, and arbitrarily double the cash to make individuals really feel like they have been wealthy. They earnestly believed they might retire to a yacht someday. This hope was sufficient to maintain dupes holding the bag for a lot too lengthy; as Bartlett wrote his ebook, some cussed devotees have been nonetheless holding and buying and selling OneCoin. In the meantime, Ignatova and her co-conspirators handled the OneCoin financial institution accounts like private piggy banks, shopping for multimillion-dollar houses the world over and investing in sketchy tasks nonetheless they noticed match.

Ignatova and her cronies by no means cared about OneCoin. They did not care in regards to the concepts they threw round in public, like “banking the world’s poor” or the “monetary revolution” and even killing bitcoin. They wished to become profitable and get out, and Bartlett marshals the panicked communications that present Ignatova scrambling for an exit whereas the worldwide monetary surveillance system crashed down onto her billion-dollar fraud. OneCoin saved chugging to the bitter finish, operating on fumes and a phantom employees effectively after Ignatova disappeared someplace inside Greece in 2017. Bartlett’s greatest guess is that she resides in worldwide waters within the Mediterranean Sea.

This ebook is full of scurrilous subplots and cheesy characters, and it provides an illuminating have a look at the world of worldwide finance and the various traps that finally did OneCoin in. It comes at an opportune time, given the general public’s ample urge for food nowadays for rip-off story. Hulu’s The Dropout and Apple TV’S WeCrashed acquired loud buzz by dramatizing how narcissists can exploit techno-optimism and plain previous human greed. The previous covers Elizabeth Holmes and her bloodsucking Theranos rip-off, whereas the latter tackles WeWork, Adam and Rebekah Neumann’s kombucha-soaked and Imaginative and prescient Fund-ed workplace cult.

Maybe we are going to see an identical streamed or televised therapy of “Dr. Ruja,” as she insisted on being referred to as, and the black gap of the OneCoin world. Like Holmes and the Neumanns, she makes an incredible villain. However Ignatova is totally different, and arguably extra sinister, than these better-known charlatans.

Theranos and WeWork humiliated elites who poured of their cash and reputations primarily based on the allure and visions of their charismatic founders. These corporations actually harm many common individuals alongside the best way; WeWork exploited its workers, whereas Theranos uncovered sufferers to probably lethal well being misinformation. However by way of funding, it was principally the well-to-do who have been on the hook.

With OneCoin, in contrast, Ignatova and her crew of legal professionals, moneymen, model consultants, and multilevel advertising maestros shamelessly focused and stole from common individuals—in lots of instances, among the world’s most susceptible. Even Ignatova’s brother Konstantin, who ran the rip-off after Ruja disappeared, felt a twinge of guilt as he hawked OneCoin packages to unsuspecting farmers in Mbarara, Uganda.

The complication with multilevel advertising frauds and Ponzi schemes is that the victims are sometimes accomplices. They’re so blinded by guarantees of riches that they harangue family members to hitch, utilizing the identical lies that labored on them. This will encourage individuals to double down on their beliefs, as a result of admitting that you just have been suckered right into a fraud additionally means admitting that you just lured your loved ones with the identical false guarantees.

The Lacking Cryptoqueen is an enchanting look into the schematics and psychology of a rip-off. Let’s hope extra individuals study in regards to the OneCoin debacle and the lady behind it. On a regular basis individuals want to guard themselves towards such predation, whether or not or not Ignatova ever sees her day in courtroom.

This text initially appeared in print underneath the headline “ScamCoin”.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here